Quality Assurance (QA) Policy
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Institutional Academic Framework
- Purpose of the Policy
- Scope
- Academic Quality Principles
- Governance Structure
- Programme Design and Approval
- Teaching and Learning Standards
- Assessment and Evaluation Policy
- Marking, Feedback and Moderation
- Academic Integrity and Misconduct
- Research Quality Assurance
- Student Support and Progression
- Faculty Standards
- External Academic Benchmarking
- Complaints and Appeals
- Risk Management
- Continuous Improvement
- Policy Review
Introduction
KIMT University is committed to delivering high-quality, internationally relevant higher education through structured academic governance, robust quality assurance mechanisms, and continuous improvement practices.
This Quality Assurance (QA) Policy defines the institutional framework used to ensure consistency in academic delivery, integrity in assessment, transparency in credit allocation, and reliability of qualifications awarded by KIMT University across all levels of study.
The policy establishes clear standards for programme design, teaching delivery, assessment practices, research supervision, student support, and institutional governance.
Institutional Academic Framework
Qualification Structure
KIMT University operates the following structured academic credit framework:
- Bachelor’s Degree: 180 Credits
- Bachelor’s Top-Up Degree: 120 Credits
- Master’s Degree: 90 Credits
- Master’s Top-Up Programme: 60 Credits
- PhD / DBA Programme: 180 Credits
Each qualification is defined by learning outcomes, student workload, assessment requirements, and research expectations.
Credit Definition
One academic credit represents a defined unit of learning achievement, including lectures, independent study, assignments, research, supervision, and assessment preparation.
Purpose of the Policy
The purpose of this policy is to:
- Ensure academic consistency and quality across all programmes;
- Maintain transparency in assessment and grading systems;
- Standardise credit allocation and academic workload;
- Strengthen student learning experience and outcomes;
- Ensure fairness, reliability, and integrity in academic processes;
- Support institutional credibility and academic reputation;
- Promote continuous improvement in teaching, learning, and research;
- Ensure compliance with internal governance standards and international academic expectations.
Scope
This policy applies to:
- All academic programmes (Bachelor, Master, PhD/DBA);
- Online, blended, and distance learning delivery modes;
- Academic staff, supervisors, and examiners;
- Programme leaders and administrative departments;
- Approved partner centres and affiliates;
- Student assessment, supervision, and progression systems;
- Research activities and dissertation processes.
Academic Quality Principles
KIMT University operates under the following principles:
All academic work must be original, ethical, and properly referenced. Plagiarism and academic misconduct are strictly prohibited.
Academic delivery and assessment standards are applied uniformly across all programmes and cohorts.
Students are clearly informed about learning outcomes, assessment criteria, grading methods, and academic expectations.
The University prioritises student engagement, academic development, and applied learning outcomes.
All academic and administrative processes are regularly reviewed and improved based on feedback and performance data.
Governance Structure
Responsible for overall institutional oversight, strategic direction, and policy approval.
Responsible for maintaining academic standards, approving programmes, and ensuring quality compliance.
Quality Assurance Committee (QAC)
Responsible for:
- Monitoring academic quality
- Reviewing assessment standards
- Conducting internal audits
- Evaluating programme performance
- Reporting improvements to Academic Board
Programme Leaders
Responsible for academic coordination, module delivery, and quality monitoring at programme level.
Faculty Members
Responsible for teaching delivery, assessment marking, supervision, and student academic support.
Programme Design and Approval
All programmes must undergo formal academic approval before delivery.
Programme design must include:
- Programme learning outcomes
- Module structure and content
- Credit allocation framework
- Assessment methodology
- Teaching and learning strategy
- Industry relevance and employability focus
- Academic benchmarking
Teaching and Learning Standards
Delivery Modes
- Online learning
- Blended learning
Learning Methods
- Lectures and tutorials
- Case studies and applied learning
- Research-based learning
- Independent study
- Project-based learning
Academic Support
- LMS-based learning resources
- Supervisor guidance
- Tutor feedback
- Academic mentoring
Assessment and Evaluation Policy
General Assessment Principles
All assessments are designed to evaluate knowledge, analytical ability, research capability, and practical application.
Assessments must be:
- Fair
- Transparent
- Valid
- Reliable
- Aligned with learning outcomes
Bachelor’s Degree Assessment Structure (180 Credits)
- Coursework Assignments: 168 Credits
- Final Project / Dissertation: 12 Credits (or structured capstone component depending on programme design)
Bachelor’s Top-Up Programme (120 Credits)
- Coursework Assignments: 108 Credits
- Final Project / Dissertation: 12 Credits
Master’s Degree Assessment Structure (90 Credits)
- Coursework Assignments: 78 Credits
- Final Dissertation / Project: 12 Credits
Master’s Top-Up Programme (60 Credits)
- Coursework Assignments: 48 Credits
- Final Dissertation / Project: 12 Credits
PhD / DBA Assessment Structure (180 Credits)
- Transfer Credit / Recognition of Prior Learning: 60 Credits
- Module-Based Advanced Research Assignments: 60 Credits
- Research Proposal Development: Part of structured research phase
- Final Thesis / Dissertation: 60 Credits
The PhD/DBA programme is research-intensive and requires progressive evaluation through supervisory review and final viva/dissertation assessment.
Marking, Feedback and Moderation
- Standardised marking rubrics are used across all programmes
- All assessments are subject to internal moderation
- Constructive feedback is provided to students
- Assessment decisions are reviewed for consistency and fairness
Academic Integrity and Misconduct
The University enforces strict academic integrity standards.
Academic misconduct includes:
- Plagiarism
- Data fabrication
- Collusion
- Cheating
- Misrepresentation of academic work
Disciplinary action may be taken in confirmed cases.
Research Quality Assurance
All postgraduate research programmes must comply with structured supervision and evaluation processes:
- Approved research proposal required before progression
- Assigned academic supervisor
- Periodic progress monitoring
- Ethical compliance in research
- Final dissertation evaluation and viva examination
Student Support and Progression
The University provides:
- Academic advising
- Supervisor support
- Learning resources via LMS
- Feedback on assessments
- Progress tracking mechanisms
Progression is granted upon successful completion of required credits.
Faculty Standards
Faculty members must demonstrate:
- Relevant academic qualifications
- Subject expertise
- Teaching capability
- Research competence (for postgraduate levels)
Performance is reviewed periodically.
External Academic Benchmarking
KIMT University ensures its academic standards are informed by:
- Internal academic regulations
- International higher education best practices
- Institutional benchmarking with global universities
- Programme relevance to industry and professional standards
Complaints and Appeals
Students have the right to:
- Submit academic complaints
- Request assessment review
- Appeal academic decisions
All cases are handled transparently and fairly through formal procedures.
Risk Management
The University identifies and manages risks affecting academic quality, including:
- Academic misconduct
- Inconsistent assessment practices
- Operational disruptions
- Student dissatisfaction
- System failures
Mitigation strategies are reviewed regularly.
Continuous Improvement
Quality improvement is ensured through:
- Student feedback analysis
- Faculty evaluations
- Programme performance review
- Internal audits
Policy Review
This Quality Assurance Policy is reviewed annually to ensure ongoing relevance, effectiveness, and institutional improvement.